翻訳と辞書 |
Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass : ウィキペディア英語版 | Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass
''Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass'' () (UKHL 1 ) is a leading decision of the House of Lords on the "directing mind" theory of corporate liability. This is a leading case on the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 section 24(1), where Tesco relied upon the defence of the ‘act or omission of another person’ i.e. their store manager, to show that they had taken all reasonable precautions and all due diligence. ==Facts== Tesco was offering a discount on washing powder which was advertised on posters displayed in stores. Once they ran out of the lower priced product the stores began to replace it with the regularly priced stock. The manager failed to take the signs down and a customer was charged at the higher price. Tesco was charged under the ''Trade Descriptions Act 1968'' for falsely advertising the price of washing powder. In its defence Tesco argued that the company had taken all reasonable precautions and all due diligence, and that the conduct of the manager could not attach liability to the corporation.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|